Tetari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72056 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Tetari Devi W/O Late Bilash Yadav Resident of Village-Tulshi Tol, Paharpur, Ward No-5, Police Station- Ballia, District- Begusarai 2.

Bijo Devi @ Pramila Devi W/O Hare Ram Yadav Resident of Village-Tulshi Tol, Paharpur, Ward No-5, Police Station- Ballia, District- Begusarai 3.

Sangita Kumari D/O Hare Ram Yadav Resident of Village-Tulshi Tol, Paharpur, Ward No-5, Police Station- Ballia, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prem Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Adv Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf fo the informant.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 115(2) and 3(5). of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women and the informant alleges that on 18-4-2025 at 10.30 a.m., on account of rain fall, water had accumulated outside her house, accordingly she asked her named agnates to remove the brick

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72056 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 2/3 for draining the rain water, on account of which the accused persons assaulted her husband and father-in-law by lathi. It is next submitted that on account of assault, her father-in-law suffered injury on head and died during the course of treatment on 20-4-2025 at PMCH.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific. It is also submitted that though it is alleged that accused persons including the petitioners assaulted her father-in-law leading to his death, but then the father-in-law suffered only one injury. It is further submitted that petitioners being female members have been implicated only to coerce the male members into submission. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72056 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 3/3 counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the fact that petitioners are women, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T