← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1154/2019dismissed

Satrudhan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-06Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1154 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2017 Thana- Nasriganj District- Rohtas ====================================================== Satrudhan Paswan S/o Shiv Pujan Paswan, Resident of Village - Pipradih, P.S. - Rohtas, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y.C.Verma, Sr.Adv.

Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. D.P.Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

06-02-2019 Heard Sri Y.C.Verma, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Dhaneshwar Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri D.P.Tiwary, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. This is 2nd attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner in respect of Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2017 registered for offence under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier, on 03-05-2018, vide Cr. Misc. No. 26513 of 2018, the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected, considering the fact that the victim was recovered from the premises of the petitioner and ransom money was also recovered.

Sri Verma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that after rejection of prayer for bail of this petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1154 of 2019(3) dt.06-02-2019 2/2 number of other accused have already been granted bail by this Court and as such, he submits that it is change in circumstance for making prayer for bail.

However, considering the fact that petitioner's case is not exactly similar to the case of other accused persons, who have been granted bail, as well as the fact that while considering the prayer for bail in respect of other accused persons, order of this Court i.e. earlier rejection order was not brought to the notice of the said Bench, there is no reason to entertain the prayer for bail.

The prayer for bail stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T