Sharda Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.78047 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2018 Thana- SIKARHATTA District- Bhojpur ======================================================

1. Sharda Singh,

2. Hridya Singh, Both Sons of Late Ran Nath Singh R/o Bahuara, P.S.- Chouri, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramashray Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Manish Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners seek bail in Sikarahata P.S. Case No. 68 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is of recovery of two live cartridges each from the possession of the petitioners.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and are in custody since 27.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78047 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2019 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Sikarahata P.S. Case No. 68 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U