Vijendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67648 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2019 Thana- BANSHI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Vijendra Kumar Son of Sukhlal Singh, Resident of Village - Harduiya Bedauli, P.O.- Shankarpur Imamganj, P.S.- Paliganj at Present Khirimore, Dist.- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bindeshwar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Mishra and Mr. Anil Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 39 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 419/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation has been made that from the folder received by the authority concerned bearing the year of appointment has been shown 2006, but in reality, the petitioner has been appointed in the year 2014.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never asserted that he was appointed in the year 2006, in fact, he was appointed in the year 2014 and he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67648 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2020 2/2 has not committed any wrong.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 39 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T