Md. Ahsan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74499 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2023 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Md. Ahsan son of Md. Yunus R/o - Mahthaur, P.S - Manigachhi, District - Darbhanga, Bihar 2.

Md. idris son of Md. Khkhan R/o - Mahthaur, P.S - Manigachhi, District - Darbhanga, Bihar 3.

Guriya Khatoon Wife of Md. Ahsan R/o - Mahthaur, P.S - Manigachhi, District - Darbhanga, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ravindra Kumar, the learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.3 is a woman and the offences, for which the instant FIR was instituted, carries punishment of seven years and less. It is next submitted that police during the course of investigation gave notice under Section 41(1) Cr.P.C. and the petitioners co-operated in the investigation and the police never

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74499 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 felt the need of arresting the petitioners but then charge sheet came to be submitted based on which cognizance was taken and thus, petitioners apprehend their arrest. It is also submitted that when police during the course of investigation never felt the need of arresting the petitioners, as such, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioners to jail based on an order of cognizance.

4. The leaned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Manigachhi P.S. Case No.221 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T