Pulkit Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71467 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2016 Thana- HARLAKHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

PULKIT SAH Son of Late Makhan Sah Resident of Village - Karuna, P.S.- Harlakhi, District- Madhubani 2.

Ramwati Devi @ Kauahawali @ Kuhawali Wife of Pulkit Sah Resident of Village - Karuna, P.S.- Harlakhi, District- Madhubani 3.

Munni Devi @ Siryapurwali Wife of Jay Kishore Sah Resident of Village - Karuna, P.S.- Harlakhi, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2019 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No. 214 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 326, 341, 307 and 448/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR on the order of petitioner No.1, petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 caught hold of the informant and one co-accused Jai Kishore Sah sprinkled oil on the sons of informant and tried to set them on fire.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that after investigation the case is not found true against the petitioners, rather against co-accused Jai Kishore Sah but

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71467 of 2019(2) dt.08-11-2019 2/2 cognizance has been taken against the petitioners. Heard learned APP also.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Benipatti (Madhubani), in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No. 214 of 2016, G.R.No. 909 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T