Pradeep Mehta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76372 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2023 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
Pradeep Mehta S/O Late Ramchandra Mehta Village- Amha Ward No. 1, Ps. Supaul, Dist. Supaul 2.
Kartik Mehta @ Kartik Kumar S/O Late Ramchandra Mehta Village- Amha Ward No. 1, Ps. Supaul, Dist. Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 342, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506, 427, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioners and other co-accused persons is that they, variously armed, entered into the house of informant. Allegation against Pradeep Mehta (Petitioner No. 1) is that he assaulted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76372 of 2023(2) dt.30-11-2023 2/3 the informant by means of Farsa due to which he sustained injury in his leg.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner No. 2, rather the allegation levelled against him is general and omnibus. It is submitted that the injury sustained by the informant, inflicted by petitioner No. 1, is simple in nature. Moreover, petitioners are languishing in judicial custody for more than 3 months.
Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76372 of 2023(2) dt.30-11-2023 3/3 on bail in connection with Supaul (Laukaha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 518 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Supaul.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U t