Prakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72652 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-657 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Prakash Kumar S/o Arvind Singh @ Dini Singh Resident of Mohalla - Sudha Talkies, P.S - Mufassil, District - Gaya. 2.

Deepak Singh @ Deepak Kumar S/o Arvind Singh @ Dini Singh Resident of Mohalla - Sudha Talkies, P.S - Mufassil, District - Gaya. 3.

Dipu Kumar @ Koiya @ Sourabh Kumar S/o Vijay Yadav Resident of Mohalla - Gourakshani, P.S - Mufassil, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 324(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that these accused-petitioners assaulted informant and his brother and also made indiscriminate firing.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, a simple verbal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72652 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 2/2 quarrel took place between the parties over, overtaking of vehicle due to which, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Though there is general and omnibus allegation of assault but there is no injury report on record to substantiate the allegations levelled against these petitioners.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and general and omnibus nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 657 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T