Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79618/2018bail granted

Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-08Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.79618 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2018 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Pappu Kumar, son of late Kedar Gope, resident of village, Gawal Bigha, P.S.- Karaiparsurai, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Smt. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Karaiparsuari P.S. Case No.98 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is recovery of 30 litres country-made liquor from a gallon and a bag which were thrown by the accused persons including the petitioner after seeing the police. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 23.10.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District &

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79618 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2019 2/2 Sessions Judge VI-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Nalanda, Biharsarif in connection with Karaiparsuari P.S. Case No.98 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T