Sudhir Kumar @ J.D v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73331 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-633 Year-2022 Thana- Arwal District- Arwal ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar @ J.D S/o Suresh Saw @ Namalum R/o vill- Vaasilpur, P.SArwal, Dist- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Shalini, Adv.
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Khalid Quraishi, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he had transported the crockery of petitioner and when he demanded his dues, it is alleged that he was assaulted causing injury on head.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73331 of 2025(2) dt.13-11-2025 2/3 informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dues relating to fare the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is next submitted that during the course of investigation the statement of the mother and grandmother of the informant was recorded, wherein they have stated that an altercation took place and the informant got pushed, on account of which, he fell and received injury but then the assault was not intentional. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and petitioner is not a criminal.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.633/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73331 of 2025(2) dt.13-11-2025 3/3 Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T