Naresh Ram Turi @ Naresh Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71866 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Gaya ====================================================== Naresh Ram Turi @ Naresh Ram S/O Late Kali Ram Resident of villageDumarichatti, P.S.- Fetehpur, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaya Mahila P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 64(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 67, 67(A) of the I.T. Act.
3. Earlier vide order dated 22.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3830 of 2025 regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the material available in the case diary against the petitioner.
4. In compliance of the order dated 10.10.2025 a report dated 06.12.2025 with regard to the present stage of trial has been received. From perusal of the aforesaid report, it appears
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71866 of 2025(4) dt.09-01-2026 2/2 that case has been committed to the court of Sessions on 03.12.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 01.09.2024 without any rhymes or reason.
6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.
7. There is no fresh ground to consider the bail petition of the petitioner as also the present stage of trial, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of five months from today. If the trial is not concluded within the period of five months, as stated above, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer before the court below. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T