← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68584/2019bail granted

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar Mahton v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-18Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68584 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== SUMIT KUMAR @ SUMIT KUMAR MAHTON Son of Bhushan Mahto Resident of Village-Godhna, Ward No.9, P.S.-Bachhwara, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate.

For the State :

Dr. (Mrs.) Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.46 of 2019 registered under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that the victim, the daughter of the informant, had gone the house of her neighbour on call but she did not return. In course of her search, the informant came to know that Alok Kumar has enticed away his daughter for the purpose of marriage.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the statement of the victim was recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the police, as detailed in paragraph-39 of the case diary, in which she has stated about her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68584 of 2019(3) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 moving with one Rupak Kumar and performing her marriage with him. Later on, due to pressure of her family, the victim in her statement, as recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has stated about her kidnapping by Rupak Paswan, Kamal Paswan and Sumit (petitioner) and committing rape on her and also giving pressure by Rupak Paswan to perform the marriage with him. Further submission is that it has come in the statement of the informant and his wife, as detailed in paragraph-16 of the case diary, that the victim talked to the informant and informed him about performing the marriage by her with Rupak Kumar. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody since 21.05.2019.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.46 of 2019.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T