Vakil Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80748 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2018 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Vakil Mahto son of late Sidheshwar Mahto.

2.

Amit Kumar.

3.

Ankit Kumar. Both sons of Vakil Mahto. All resident of Village- Bingama, P.S.- Patori, District-Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-04-2019 It appears from the case diary that process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioners.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been given an interim protection vide order dated 04.02.2019, however, from perusal of the case diary it appears that this application has been filed on 31.12.2018 and prior to that the process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has been issued.

Heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, rather they should

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80748 of 2018(5) dt.16-04-2019 2/2 surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on the basis of materials available on record. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amjad/- U T