← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72140/2025bail granted

Sanjay Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-14Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72140 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2024 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Sanjay Sahni S/o Babulal Sahni R/o vill - Manikpur, P.S. - Minapur, Distt.- Muzaffarpur 2.

Ranju Devi @ Ranjana Devi W/o Sanjay Sahni R/o vill - Manikpur, P.S. - Minapur, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State .

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191 (1) , 191 ( 2 ), 191 (3) , 109, 74, 117 ( 2 ) and 352 of the BNS. 3 . As per the prosecution case , informant namely , Babu Lal Sahni alleged that on 21.12.2024 , when informant was on his field, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioner variously armed came there and assaulted informant, his wife and son due to which they sustained

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72140 of 2025(2) dt.14-10-2025 2/3 injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that it is evident from the F.I.R. that as many as 13 persons have been made accused in this case and out of them, specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Santosh Sahni. So far as these petitioners are concerned, there is no specific allegation of any overt act attributed against them. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Informant is father of petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No. 2 is wife of petitioner No. 1 who has also lodged a case against informant and others. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5 . Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition .

6 Considering the aforesaid fact, general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class (East ) Muzafffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No. 422 of 2024 , subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72140 of 2025(2) dt.14-10-2025 3/3 conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T