Raja Sah @ Rajwa v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75228 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-682 Year-2023 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Raja Sah @ Rajwa S/O Late Vishwnath Sah Village- Kaparpura, Tarma Chauk, Ps. Kanti, Dist. Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-12-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 682 of 2023 dated 02.09.2023 for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
4. As per the prosecution case, total 67.980 litres of illicit liquor has been recovered from the house of the coaccused Sarhu Sah and 11.340 litres of foreign liquor and 9 litres of beer was recovered from the house of the co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75228 of 2023(2) dt.07-12-2023 2/3 Manti Devi. It is further stated that the apprehended co-accused told that the seized liquor were supplied to them by the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is accused in one more criminal case as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is supplier of the said liquor.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75228 of 2023(2) dt.07-12-2023 3/3
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 682 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T