Malti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73890 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2022 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== MALTI DEVI W/O Jitendra Rai R/O Village Bahadurpur, P.S- Agiaon, District-Bhojpur (Ara) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 419 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is said to have forged in place of the informant identity card the petitioner herself annexed her photo on it and the informant's son namely, Niku Chaudhary executed the sale deed to her. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is an illiterate lady having no knowledge of the conspiracy of the informant and her son, and without knowing the fact, she gave her photo and which is used

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73890 of 2022(3) dt.27-04-2023 2/2 in unlawful purpose. He submitted that there is no separation between the informant and his son co-accused Niku Chaudhary. The informant resides in the same premises and for putting extra pressure, this false case was filed by the informant because the case is of Civil in nature and try to give criminal colour to grab the money received by the sons of the informant. He is languishing in judicial custody since 10.09.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 355 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T