Patna High CourtL.P.A/1329/2019withdrawn

Manibhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-24The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1329 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.135 of 2019 ====================================================== Manibhushan Singh S/o Ram Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Murli Basantpur, P.O. Murli Basantpur, P.S. Bangaon, District Saharsa Bihar. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Labour Employment and Training Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

Commissioner Koshi Division, Saharsa 3.

District Magistrate Saharsa 4.

Deputy Collector Establishment, Saharsa ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Mukund, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 24-02-2021 This appeal is directed against the order dated 05.09.2019, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 135 of 2019, titled as Manibhushan Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors., by a learned Single Judge of this Court.

The impugned order, in toto, reads as under:

"The petitioner has raised the claim of regularisation in the instant proceedings. The stand of the respondents is that the petitioner was placed at serial No. 6 in the panel and none below the petitioner in the unreserved category

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1329 of 2019(3) dt.24-02-2021 2/2 has been selected. The petitioner therefore was not entitled to any regularisation.

It is submitted by petitioner's counsel that the post against which the petitioner was entitled to be regularised has been given to one candidate from the reserved category. He submits that he would be approaching the authorities assailing the regularisation of one Sri Mahadeo Prasad Yadav.

In view of the said submission, since the issue has to be considered by the authorities, no orders are required to be passed in the instant proceeding. The writ petition is dismissed."

The present appeal is totally misconceived.

Reluctantly, we allow the appellant to withdraw the present appeal enabling him to take recourse to such remedies as are otherwise available in law.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/- U