Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76078 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2013 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== Anil Singh Son Of Late Vijay Singh Resident Of Village - Raksa, P.S.- Ekangarsarai, District - Nalanda At Present Tilak Nagar, Phase - 2, P.S.- Rupaspur, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vaishnavi Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged against the petitioner that he produced forged documents with regard to plot No. 70 under Patliputra Cooperative Society.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76078 of 2023(2) dt.28-11-2023 2/3 been implicated in this case. The power of attorney and its rectification of power of attorney was executed by Dr. Girish Nandan Prasad in which he has mentioned the name of his father as son of Late S.N.Prasad and said S.N. Prasad is also known as Dr. Sideshwari Nandan Prasad and that is the reason that all his four sons have also the title of Nandan Prasad. There is absolutely nothing to suggest that any document executed in favour of the petitioner i.e. deed of conveyance or rectification of power of attorney is forged save and except the vague imaginary statement given by the informant. Even from the F.I.R, there is no allegation that Dr. Girish Nandan Prasad has made any written complaint that either he has not executed any deed of power of attorney in favour of the petitioner or his signature is forged. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 24.07.2023.
In contra, learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76078 of 2023(2) dt.28-11-2023 3/3 the petitioner.
Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 58 of 2013.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T