Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31221/2018allowed

Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-07Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31221 of 2018 (2) dt.07-06-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31221 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -265 Year- 2018 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Manoj Kumar Son of Gopal Yadav Resident of Village - Tilan Bigha, P.S. - Goh, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-06-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Barachatti Police Station Case No. 265 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 30(a), 38 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is not involved in dealing with illegal liquor. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31221 of 2018 (2) dt.07-06-2018 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti Police Station Case No. 265 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T