Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71703/2019bail granted

Mehadi Mian @ Mehandi Mia v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-20Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71703 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2019 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== MEHADI MIAN @ MEHANDI MIA Son of Mir Hasan Ansari @ Mir Hasan Miya Resident of Village- Rampur Jaga, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Chandra Sen Pd Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Police recovered a stolen motorcycle from one Shahrukh Sheikh who disclosed that he brought the said motorcycle from the petitioner's house.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovery of the motorcycle, in question, has not been made from petitioner's possession. Save and except the confession of coaccused, nothing incriminating has come against the petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Gopalganj in Gopalpur Police Station Case No. 66 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71703 of 2019(2) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T