← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77295/2024allowed

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Yadav @ Bikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-10Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77295 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2021 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Yadav @ Bikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar Yadav Son of Birendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Silwey, P.S.- Halsi, Dist.- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 419, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, one Sonu Kumar was trying to withdraw money from the account of the informant but was detained by the Bank officials and it was found that by using duplicate cheque he got transferred the money from account of bank to his account and while withdrawing he was detained.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77295 of 2024(3) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 He submits that the charge has been framed against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody since 18.09.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 35 of 2021, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and if he fails to appear on two consecutive dates his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T