Kamal Prasad Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.749 of 2023 ====================================================== Kamal Prasad Ray Son of Late Hazari Lal Rai Alias Hazari Prasad Sah, resident of Village Madarpur, Post Office Izra, Police Station Hajipur Sadar, District Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Secretariat Buildings, Patna800001. 2.
The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Secretariat Buildings, Patna- 800001.
3.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Secretariat Buildings, Patna. 4.
The Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.
5.
The Additional Collector Revenue and Land Reforms Department Vaishali at Hajipur.
6.
Krishna Kumar Singh Son of Name not known, Circle Officer, Hajipur, District Vaishali.
7.
Arun Paswan Son of Name not known, Previous Karmchari of Halka No. 2, Hajipur, District Vaishali.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Najmul Hoda For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sajid Salim Khan ( Sc 25 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this writ application is for a direction to the respondent authorities to take disciplinary action against the respondent nos. 6 and 7 for establishing Jamabandi in regard to the land in question for which lands Jamabandi was established in the name of the petitioner more than three decades ago in accordance with law and it
Patna High Court CWJC No.749 of 2023(2) dt.19-09-2023 2/2 was continuing till today and upto date land Revenue was paid and behind the back of the petitioner and without any notice to the petitioner in the circumstances set forth below."
2.
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U