Poonam Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18206 of 2022 ====================================================== Poonam Devi, Wife of Manoj Kumar Prasad Gond Resident of Belagola, Hari Nagar, Ward No. - 20, P.S.- Ramnagar, District - West Champaran, Bettia, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3.
The Additional Chief Secretary Department of Health Govt. of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.
4.
The Executive Director, the State Health Society, Sheikhpura, Patna. 5.
The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 6.
The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettia. 7.
The Regional Director Health Society, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 8.
The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, West Champaran, Bettia. 9.
The Additional Chief Medical Officer, West Champaran, Bettia. 10.
Shri Salim Javed, the District Program Manager, District Health Society Unit, West Champaran, Bettia.
11.
Vinod Kumar, the District Account Manager, Dist Health Society Unit, West Champaran, Bettia.
12.
The DDC West Champaran, Bettia.
13.
The Sub Divisional Officer, West Champaran, Bettia. 14.
The District Accounts Officers, West Champaran, Bettia. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Sudha Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.P.K. Verma (AAG-3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 07-04-2023 The Public Interest Litigation is with respect to financial irregularities in the purchase of medicines. A counter
Patna High Court CWJC No.18206 of 2022 dt.07-04-2023 2/2 affidavit dated 06.04.2023 has been placed on record, wherein it is stated that proceedings were taken and fourteen officers/officials have been suspended and are being departmentally proceed with.
Considering the various averments made in the counter affidavit, we are of the opinion that the Public Interest Litigation can be closed.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) P.K.P./Anushka AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 10.04.2023 Transmission Date