Ravi Shankar @ Ravi Raj v. That State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16563 of 2024 ====================================================== Ravi Shankar @ Ravi Raj Son of Dashrath Prasad Mahto Resident of Village Talbanshipur, P.O. and P.S. Surajgaraha, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

That State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

THe Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director in Chief (Disease Control, Public Health and Paramedical) Health Services, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Regional Additional Director, Health Services, Purnea Division, Purnea. 5.

The District Magistrate, Kishanganj.

6.

The Additional Collector, Establishment, Kishanganj 7.

The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Kishanganj 8.

The Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Medical Officer, Kishanganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan, Advocate Mr. Nihal Beg, Advocate Mr. Shive Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, AC to SC-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-11-2024 Heard Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned AC to SC-12 for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to avail remedy before the appropriate authority for the relief as prayed for in the present writ petition.

3. Considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, if so advised, may file a

Patna High Court CWJC No.16563 of 2024(2) dt.13-11-2024 2/2 detailed representation before the appropriate authority for considering his case for promotion, who is directed to call for the service particulars of the petitioner and take conscious decision considering the eligibility of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expiditiously.

4. In case, the concerned authority delay in any manner for no plausible reason, then, in that case, the petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

5. With above observations/directions, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U