← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76657/2024allowed

Md. Bambal @ Sarif Ali @ Md. Bamla v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-17Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76657 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2024 Thana- GORIAKOTHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Md. Bambal @ Sarif Ali @ Md. Bamla S/O Shaukat Ali Resident of Village - Heyatpur, P.S. - G.B. Nagar, (Tarwara), District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-01-2025 Heard Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 385, 379, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 09.05.2024, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons and 10-15 unknown person came and assaulted cousin brother of the informant and when the informant came to save his cousin brother, then they also assaulted him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76657 of 2024(2) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that there is specific allegation against co-accuseds, namely, Sahid Ali, Tahir Ansari, Arman Ansari and Kausar Ansari. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Goreakothi P.S. Case No. 101 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T