← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71361/2019dismissed

Om Prakash Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71361 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2019 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

OM PRAKASH GUPTA, aged about 38 years (M), Son of Late Ramayan Sah.

2.

Munna Sah @ Muna sah, aged about 31 years (M), Son of Late Suresh Sah. Both resident of Village - Chanaur, P.S.- Dhanauti O.P., DistrictSiwan. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Jaynath Thakur, son of Jamuna Thakur, resident of village + P.O.- Chanaur, P.S.- Dhanauti O.P., District- Siwan.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, APP For the Opposite Party No. 2 :

Mr. Vijay Prakash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-11-2021 Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Siwan Muffasil (Dhanauti O.P.) P.S. Case No. 304 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B, 323, 384 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Pursuant to last order dated 17.11.2021 both the parties are personally present in the Court.

I have personally interacted with the parties. This is a case in which the accused persons knowing fully well that the land, in question, has been purchased earlier by the prosecution

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71361 of 2019(8) dt.23-11-2021 2/2 party, have got executed a sale deed in the year 2019 and now this plea of land dispute for grant of anticipatory bail is illadvised. If a person commits fraud and cheating knowing that he is purchasing a land which is already sold through a registered sale deed then he does not deserve anticipatory bail because this transaction gives rise to litigation. In that view of the matter, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed.

The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If the petitioners do not surrender within the aforesaid period of four weeks, the Superintendent of Police, Siwan, is directed to get the petitioners arrested. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T