Subodh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76879 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2024 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Subodh Rai S/O Late Snehi Rai R/O Village - Chakhabib P.S. and Dist.- Vashali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2024 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Vaishali PS case no. 321 of 2024, disclosing offences punishable under Section 109 and other allied sections of the B.N.S. 2023.

3.

The prosecution story, as per the Fardbeyan of the informant, is that on 10.08.2024 at 10.25 pm, when the informant along with his family members were sitting at the door, petitioner along with other accused persons came and started abusing the informant. when the informant protested, petitioner assaulted on the head of informant's father by iron rod causing head injury. It is alleged that petitioner also assaulted the informant by iron rod on his head but he stopped with his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76879 of 2024(2) dt.19-11-2024 2/2 hand causing fracture on his hand. Other accused persons assaulted his wife and daughter and snatched golden chain of his wife worth Rs. 1,20,000/-.

4.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. Learned counsel further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of petitioner. 5.

Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6.

From perusal of impugned order, it appears that due to assault made by petitioner on the head of informant's father, he sustained head injury, which is grievous in nature. 7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U T