Bhola Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 75441 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-681 Year-2024 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna ====================================================== Bhola Kumar S/O Rambalak Yadav R/O Village- Gopalpur, P.SPakaribarawan, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate :

Mr. Amresh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prakash Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 103 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant gave written report alleging therein that he is running grocery shop and his son had gone out for having his meal and when his son did not return, the informant along with others started searching for him, however, they could not locate the son of the informant and subsequently, the informant learnt that his son along with Rohit Kumar had entered a transformer repairing workshop for committing theft and there, the owner of the shop along with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 75441 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/3 other accused persons assaulted the son of the informant and his companion and left them grievously injured and then the police with the help of local people had taken the informant's son and one other to the Sub-divisional Hospital, Danapur where they were declared dead.

4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and informant has not raised any suspicion or whisper against this petitioner in the FIR. The name of the petitioner transpired during course of investigation in the confessional statement of the co-accused Rahul Kumar and except confessional statement, no other cogent material has come during the investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in this case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of the petitioner and other circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Patna in connection with Digha

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 75441 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No. 681 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) AjayMishra/- U T