Musharaf Ansari @ Md. Musaraf Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76637 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2025 Thana- BARSOI District- Katihar ====================================================== Musharaf Ansari @ Md. Musaraf Ansari S/O Late Nakimuddin Ansari Resident of Dalkola (West Bengal) Bhulki baliamani gol pokhar, P.S.- North Dinajpur, Dist.- North Dinajpur, West Bengal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 87, 96 of the B.N.S.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that her daughter aged about 16 years on 14.02.2025 at 3.30 P.M. went for coaching but did not return, on inquiry, it transpired that petitioner enticed her daughter and kept her in his house, accordingly, the informant went to the house of the accused persons when petitioner and his mother abused her and said that victim will not be returned.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76637 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the victim were in love and they eloped and performed their marriage and are leading a peaceful conjugal life. It is next submitted that even victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS has not supported the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that date of birth of the victim is 23.11.2008 as such on the date of occurrence the victim was nearly 17 years as such she had reached the age of discretion and was capable of understanding the consequences of her action.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barsoi P.S. Case No.29/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76637 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 3/3 Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T