← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21792/2019disposed

Kusheshwar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-07Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21792 of 2019 ====================================================== Kusheshwar Thakur Son of Sukhdeo Thakur, Resident of Village- Karahiya Dih, P.O. Balha, P.S. Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, Madhubani.

3.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Madhubani.

4.

The Block Supply Officer, Rajnagar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Alok Ranjan AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has approached this Court for setting aside the order contained in memo no. 460 dated 31.08.2018 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Madhubani by which the PDS License of the petitioner has been cancelled. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that his license has been cancelled by a non-speaking order and that too without considering the show cause filed by him. After some arguments, he seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Madhubani.

Without going into the merits of the case, this writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.21792 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2021 2/2 application is disposed off with a direction to respondent no. 3the Sub- Divisional Officer, Madhubani that if the petitioner files a fresh representation along with a copy of this order before him, the same shall be considered and he would pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four months from the date of filing of the representation. It is made clear that respondent no. 3 would be solely responsible for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed off.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U