Golu @ Gullu @ Gulu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.604 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2018 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== GOLU @ GULLU @ GULU KUMAR S/o Tarkeshwar Rai R/vill-Pahiya Dhala P.S-Rivilganj,Distt.-Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anant Kumar Bhaskar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2019 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rivilganj P.S.Case no.292 of 2018 dated 10.9.2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that while the informant was coming, he was assaulted by the petitioner and Rs.10,000/- was snatched from him.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact there was a match and in that match the informant received head injury and no such occurrence has taken place.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that the injured has named this petitioner and also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.604 of 2019(4) dt.27-03-2019 2/2 stated that he has been assaulted and taken away Rs.10,000/- as well as the injury report shows that the injury is grievous in nature.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilge fo anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T