← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79859/2018dismissed

Shaukat Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79859 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2018 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Shaukat Ansari so of Late Subhan Ansari, Resident of vill. Hasanadih, P.S. Nokha District Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nokha P.S.Case No.216 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 364, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with the others have taken the brother of the informant and from that date he is traceless.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except suspicion there is nothing against him and one of the co-accused has confessed his guilt and he has narrated the entire story but he has not named this petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that the other witnesses have also stated that that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79859 of 2018(3) dt.28-02-2019 2/2 petitioner along with others have taken brother of the informant and he is traceless..

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T