Ramprakash Kumar @ Ram Prakash Rai @Natwar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75289 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2019 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAMPRAKASH KUMAR @ RAM PRAKASH RAI @NATWAR RAY Son of Harendra Ray Resident of Kailapatti, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, the informant alleged that when he was working at Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd., Saraiya, meanwhile, six miscreants armed with pistols entered in the branch and looted away cash of Rs. 4,93,259/- including other documents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is not named in FIR rather he has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Neither the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75289 of 2022(4) dt.19-06-2023 2/2 petitioner was arrested on spot nor any looted money has been recovered from his conscious possession. The name of the petitioner has been transpired in this case on the basis of confession made by co-accused namely, Md. Osama who has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.8.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1415 of 2022, hence the case of this petitioner stands on similar footing of that of the co-accused. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 6.8.2022. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 379 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T