Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3514 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12329 of 2024 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Son of Manoranjan Paswan, resident of Village- Juniar. P.S.- Hilsa, District-Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the chief Secretary, Department of Health, at Patna, namely Shri Pratyaya Amrit.
2.
The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan. Bailey Road, Patna, namely Dr.B.Rajendra. 3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, namely Shri Pratyaya Amrit. 4.
The Special Secretary, Department of Health, Govt of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, namely Shri Shashank Shekhar Sinha. 5.
The Additional Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, namely Shri Vaibhav Choudhary. 6.
The Bihar Technical Services Commission, 19, Harding Road, Govt. of Bihar, Patna through its Secretary namely Shri Arunabh Channdra Verma. 7.
The Chairman, Bihar Technical Services Commission, namely Shri R.P.Singh.
8.
The Secretary, Bihar Technical Services Commission, namely Shri Arunabha Chandra Verma.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 03-04-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received a copy of the show cause and in view of the statement made in the show cause, it appears that the order dated 22.08.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12329 of 2024 has
Patna High Court MJC No.3514 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 been duly complied with. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw this M.J.C. petition.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding is hereby dropped and the present M.J.C. petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U