Indrajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75150 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2025 Thana- HAJIPUR RAIL P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Indrajeet Kumar Son of Braj Kishore Singh Resident of Village -Mahboob Khan Tola, P.S. - K. Hat (Sahayak), District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-01-2026 Heard Mr. Chandan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rail P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111, 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26/35 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from a Bolero car, driving license, Aadhar card, PAN card, and an arms license were found. From the front and rear seats of the car, 50 live cartridges wrapped in black-colored foil were also recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75150 of 2025(3) dt.09-01-2026 2/3 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the name of this petitioner has surfaced during the course of investigation. He has been impleaded in this case, as the said bullets were purchased from the shop of this petitioner. The petitioner is a licensed dealer of the arms. He also submits that he has sold the bullets on the arms license of one Jagdish Prasad, which was shown to him. It has further been submitted that as the petitioner has sold the bullets on the armed license, he has committed no offence. It has also been submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 79923 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.07.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75150 of 2025(3) dt.09-01-2026 3/3 Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur in connection with Rail P.S. Hajipur Case No. 112 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T