Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78888 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2023 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh Son Of Late Sushil Singh R/O VillageBedi Ban, Madhuban, Bahi Tola, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have come at the house of the informant and started abusing him. They also assaulted the informant, his father and mother and looted a golden chain worth Rs. 50,000/- from the neck of the informant's mother and Rs. 5000/- from the pocket of the informant's father.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is no specific
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78888 of 2023(2) dt.12-12-2023 2/2 overt act against the petitioner. He submits that no case is made out under Section 307 of the IPC against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has two criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail submits that the injury found upon the victim is grievous in nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 85 of 2023. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T