Umesh Ram @ Umesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72747 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2025 Thana- BADDI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Umesh Ram @ Umesh Kumar Shatrudhan Ram @ Satrughn Ram (It may be read as 31 years in place of 40 years as per Adhar Card of the petitioner and his date of birth is 03.01.1995)R/o Village - Murlipur, P.S. - Baddi, Dist. - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Baddi P.S. Case no.89 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 127(2), 351(2), 309(4) and 3/5 of BNS, 2023.

3. Allegation in the F.I.R is that petitioner along with others on motorcycle snatched mobile phone of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case relates to snatching of mobile phone from the possession of the informant and the name of the petitioner transpired in the F.I.R itself, however, the same was lodged after a delay of two days which has been stated in the F.I.R. itself that the three persons on motorcycle had concealed their faces with gamchas and in such circumstances, the alleged identification of the petitioner is highly doubtful. The petitioner is in custody

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72747 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 since 24.05.2025 and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 24.05.2025 and trial has yet not commenced, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Baddi P.S. Case no.89 of 2025 of 202 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the further condition that the petitioner would co-operate in the trial and physically present in the trial Court on each and every date till framing of charges and in case the petitioner would absent on two consecutive dates, the learned trial Court would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T