Md. Saifullah @ Safiullah Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72453 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Saifullah @ Safiullah Alam S/O Sheikh Salauddin @ Salauddin Alam @ Shekh Salauddin Resident of village- Pujaha Patjilwa, P.S.- Srinagar, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that two unknown miscreants looted Rs. 1,62,140/- from the informant on the point of pistol.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72453 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/2 of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused, namely, Anish Raj and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that neither any looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor any T.I. parade has been conducted in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 09.06.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T