Arvind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73229 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2024 Thana- SALAIYA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Arvind Yadav, S/o Ramchandra Yadav, R/o Village - Bundi Bigha, P.S - Salaiya, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard Mr. Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Salaiya P.S. Case No. 6 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 308 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the disputed land was received from Bhudhan Yagya Committee and in that land, potatoes were grown. On the alleged date of the occurrence, the petitioner along with other went there being armed with lathi-danda. It is alleged that the petitioner was having a sword and he has assaulted with sword on the head of one Satyendra Yadav. Satyendra Yadav received grievous injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73229 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is also a counter version of this case and both the parties are claiming the land to be there. There has been a free fight between the parties and in that fight, both the parties have received injuries. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since21.08.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Salaiya P.S. Case No. 6 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T