M/S Dhirendra Construction Private Limited v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17055 of 2025 ====================================================== M/s Dhirendra Construction Private Limited 318, Sri Krishna Nagar, Motihari, 845401 through its Director, Rajeev Kumar, Male, aged about 39 years, Son of Yamuna Singh, Resident of village- Barmadiya, P.S- Chakia, District- East Champaran at Motihari, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Chief Engineer (North), Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Dhaka, East Champaran at Motihari.

6.

Rishi Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd., Registered office Sri Krishna Nagar, Motihari-845401, Administrative Office House No.- 45, Anandpuri West Boring Canal Road, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate : Dr.Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate : Mr.Ayush Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Kanishk Shankar, Advocate : Mr. Kanishk Kaustabh, Advocate : Mr. Rajnish Prakash, Advocate : Mr. Lakshmi Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Amish Kumar, A.C. to A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 09-02-2026 Heard Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Amish Kumar, learned A.C. to A.G. for the State.

2. After some arguments, learned senior counsel for

Patna High Court CWJC No.17055 of 2025(4) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with liberty to challenge any adverse order, if passed, on the basis of the proposal made by the Technical Evaluation Committee.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

4. Accordingly, the present writ application stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Sudhir Singh, J) (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U