Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76031 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2022 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Son Of Mahendra Yadav @ Mahendra Prasad Yadav Resident Of Village- Tamua, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants came on motorcycles, who are armed with weapon overtook the vehicle of the informant and looted collected amount of Rs. 1, 95,000/-, mobile and other documents of the informant and they also made fire in the air.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76031 of 2023(3) dt.31-01-2024 2/2 of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 10.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 54 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T