Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74188 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- Bhararhi District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

Abhishek Kumar S/O Dinesh Paswan Resident of village- Bharrahi Bazar, ward no 01, P.s.- Bharrahi, District- Madhepura 2.

Satyam Kumar S/O Suresh Paswan Resident of village- Tuniyahi ward no 02, P.s.- Madhepura, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bharrahi Bazar P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 for the offence under sections 331(4) and 305 of the B.N.S. lodged on 12.04.2025 by the informant, Subhash Kumar Yadav.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he had gone to Kolkata after putting a lock in his house and later came to know that theft has been committed. Upon return, found the ornaments and other articles missing. The miscreants also broken the DVR/hard disk. However, the information came that the accused persons went to Bharrahi Bazar on a tempo and the said pen-drive footage was handed over to the Police which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74188 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 led to the FIR.

4. Though learned counsel for the petitioners impressed upon this Court about the innocence as also that they do not have any criminal antecedent, learned APP has taken this Court to the learned Sessions Judge order to show that their name cropped up from the very beginning.

5. The learned Sessions Judge also recorded that the petitioners should surrender and seek bail on the materials available on record, instead the present petition.

6. This Court has no reason to take a different view from what has been averred by the learned Sessions Judge.

7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

8. If, however, the petitioners surrender within four weeks, the concerned Court shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U T