← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77967/2024allowed

Lakshman Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-03Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77967 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2024 Thana- NTPC District- Patna ====================================================== Lakshman Yadav Son of Devendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Mangarchak, P.S.- NTPC, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-04-2025 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Rina Sinha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the husband of the informant was murdered by unknown miscreants. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with others cremated the dead body.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that in FIR there is no allegation against him of committing the offence, but the allegation is that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77967 of 2024(3) dt.03-04-2025 2/2 he has cremated the deceased. In this case, petitioner has also given his confessional statement and in his statement, he has confessed his guilt. There is nothing except confessional statement against him. Similarly situated other co-accused person namely, Pramod Yadav has been granted bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 61215 of 2024. The case of this petitioner is of similar footing. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 08.04.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with N.T.P.C. P.S. Case No. 49 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1st Barh, Patna. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T