← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13144/2018bail granted

Ravi Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-19Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13144 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -337 Year- 2016 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Ravi Raushan Kumar, son of Umesh Rai, Resident of Village- Gaushpur Izara, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is husband of the victim of dowry death. Allegation is of demand of dowry and torture of the same. Petitioner is in custody since 18.01.2017.

The report of the learned court below at flag A would reveal that even trial has not been committed to the court of Sessions.

Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13144 of 2018 (6) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 Considering the entire facts above, especially, the period already undergone by the petitioner and non-conclusion of trial in near future, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Hajipur Sadar Police Station Case No. 337 of 2016, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/Sanjeev U T