Pushpendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri (Dr.) S. Siddharth
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3741 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12540 of 2022 ====================================================== Pushpendra Kumar, Son of Raghubansh Singh, Resident of Village - Chanp, P.O. - Chanp, P.S. - Akhodigola, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Sri (Dr.) S. Siddharth the Principal Secretary now the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
2.
Sri (Dr.) S. Siddharth, the Principal Secretary now the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.
Smt. Udita Singh, the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 4.
Sri Nishant Gunjan, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Rohtas at Sasaram.
5.
Sri Madan Rai, the District Education Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 6.
Sri Pankaj Kumar, the Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 7.
Md. Ahsan, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.
8.
Naushad Alam Sidique, the Block Development Officer, Nasriganj, P.O. and P.S.- Nasriganj, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 9.
Sri Mayank Kumar, the Principal, Primary School, Amolava, Block and P.S. - Nasriganj, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.
10.
Smt. Anita Devi, the Mukhiya-cum-Chairman, Panchayat Niyojan Ekai, Parsiyan, Block - Nasriganj, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 11.
Sri Ranjeet Rajak, the Panchayat Secretary-cum-Member Secretary, Panchayat Niyojan Ekai, Parsiyan, Block - Nasriganj, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025 Learned Advocate for the respective parties are present.
2. At the outset, learned Advocate for the petitioner
Patna High Court MJC No.3741 of 2024(3) dt.22-08-2025 2/2 submitted that in view of the subsequent development, the present contempt petition has become infructuous.
3. In view of the submission advanced, the present contempt petition stands closed as having become infructuous. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U