Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6214/2018bail granted

Vikash Kumar @ Vicky @ Vikky @ Vikash v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6214 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -316 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA KOTWALI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar @ Vicky @ Vikky @ Vikash, son of Ashok Kumar Gupta, Resident of Mohalla- Tekari Road, P.S. Kotwali, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramashish For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 15.05.2017, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22564 of 2017 with direction to the trial court to expedite and conclude the trial as soon as possible.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been in custody since 07.11.2016 and in spite of direction of this court no substantive progress has been made in the trial as only one witness has been examined uptil now. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6214 of 2018 (4) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Gaya, in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 316 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T