Luro Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 80133 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2023 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== LURO SINGH, aged about 52 years, son of late Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Karna, Post + PS - Parvatta, District - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2 The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parbatta PS Case No 86 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120B, 341, 323, 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3 Perusal of the First Information Report and impugned order dated 27.07.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge VII, Khagaria show that on the basis of written report of informant Sriram Singh, the police registered FIR under Sections 302, 120B, 341, 323, 325/34 of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Perusal of the FIR further shows that specific allegation is against the petitioner Luro
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80133 of 2023(4) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 Singh for causing bullet injury on the body of wife of the informant. From perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the informant, in his restatement recorded in paragraph 3 of the case diary, supported the FIR. In paragraphs 7, 8, 9, 12, 46 of the case diary, witnesses supported the statement of informant and post mortem report shows the cause of death as severe massive haemorrhage/bleeding due to gunshot injury resulting into death.
4 In these circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, this bail petition is rejected.
5 However, learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within six months of receiving a copy of this order. 6 If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period of six months, the petitioner may renew the prayer for bail before the trial Court and the trial Court shall grant bail to the petitioner.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) M.E.H./- U T