← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./380/2023allowed

Ranvir Kumar @Ranvir Yadav @Bochu Yadav @Bocha v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.380 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2021 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Ranvir Kumar @RANVIR Yadav @BOCHU Yadav @BOCHA S/O Ramjanam Yadav R/V- Hasanchak, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner that he along with other accused persons had assaulted the informant in intoxicated condition by butt of revolver on head causing injury to him and they fled away by resorting firing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the allegation has been made that all the accused persons assaulted due to which the informant sustained

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.380 of 2023(2) dt.20-03-2023 2/2 injury on head but the doctor has not found any injury on head rather the doctor found a simple injury on forearm. He submits that other accused persons has been granted anticipatory bail by the court below, it is clear from the impugned order. Petitioner has got two criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no arms were recovered from the conscious possession or from the house of the petitioner and there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 181 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T