Salamat Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16926 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1940 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Salamat Ansari, Son of Late Jahoor Ansari, Resident of MohallaChaukhandi, Police Station- Sasaram (Town), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Pravesh Nath Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sasaram Town Police Station Case No. 1940 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner that on his order several persons assaulted the informant and his brother. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no allegation of assault has been leveled against the petitioner and at best the allegation against the petitioner is that he is the order giver.

Learned counsel for the informant also could not controvert the above submission of the petitioner. Having heard both sides. considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16926 of 2018 (3) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sasaram Town Police Station Case No. 1940 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is further subject to the condition that:- I.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

II.

The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event on failure of his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T