Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73306 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- IMADPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Vijay Ram Son of Late Baswan Ram Resident of Imadpur, P.S. - Imadpur, Dist. - Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 17.08.2024 at about 09:45 O'clock, the son of the informant, on being called by Vishram Kahar, went to his house to attend a birthday party. The son of the informant did not return, and at about 01:00 A.M., some villagers informed him that someone, after killing Pushpam Raj Kumar, had thrown his dead body in the school. The informant alleged that this petitioner, with the help of other unknown persons, killed his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not an eye-witness to the occurrence. The petitioner has been made an accused in this case merely on suspicion on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73306 of 2025(3) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 the ground that allegedly, the daughter of the informant was in love with the deceased and that two days prior to the occurrence, the petitioner along with others had threatened the son of the informant. Save and except suspicion, there is no other material to show the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 19.08.2024, the charge-sheet has already been submitted and he claims to have clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail.

6. Considering the nature of the accusations and the period of custody, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Imadpur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2024.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T